#10: The Spin-Off – “Puss in Boots”

Shrek was an animation sensation when it hit theaters back in 2001. Shrek 2 (2004) kept the series afloat with more clever fairytale culture references and jokes. However, the only thing that really came out of the sequel was the furry feline sidekick Shrek and Donkey acquired along the way, Antonio Banderas’s Puss… In Boots! While this kitty cat stole the show, did he necessarily earn a spinoff prequel? Since this film was originally intended to be a Direct-to-DVD feature… Not really.

The adorable stares don’t save this film from mediocrity.

In this animated re-imagining of Puss In Boots’s origins, we find Puss growing up as an orphan with his only friend, Humpty Dumpty. Years later, Puss is branded as an outlaw and no longer associated with Humpty. In need of dinero for cream and milk, Puss undertakes a quest, with his new friend Kitty Softpaws, to steal magic beans.

With such a stellar cast, one would think that a film with this kind of stardom wouldn’t be wasted behind cartoon characters. Antonio Banderas’s silky smooth voice keeps the suave now associated with this cat of legend. As for any new developments to the character, Banderas just keeps doing what he has done for the past three Shrek movies. Why change what earned him a spinoff?

rolling_in_money

Salma Hayek’s character Kitty Softpaws is Puss’s potential love interest and in many ways his equal. Both cats steal for a living, and are quite skilled dancers as portrayed in a Latin dance sequence. In the cat club where they have their dance battle, the Hype-Cat seen in the commercials steals the movie with his repeated “Oooooooohs!” and giant eyes.

The other major player is Humpty Dumpty. Voiced by one of the most in-demand comedic actors, Zach Galifianakis, this egg (SPOILER ALERT) is a little more rotten than he looks. Playing the former best friend of Puss, Humpty is not your typical nursery rhyme. Galifianakis gets a chance to show off his more serious side in Humpty’s backstory. This devious character brings few laughs, but much of the movie’s menace to the screen. While the change is nice and is definitely an unexpected turn from the funny-man that I thought I would be seeing, his role just doesn’t come out strong enough for the audience to actually ever be concerned for Puss in Humpty’s diabolical plot of revenge.

What was interesting about this animated feature was that it turned out to be light on laughs. The slightly overused kitty jokes and wide-eyed adorable stares of Puss only carry this movie so far into the realm of a comedy. Crafting this into an action-comedy instead of a comedy with action sequences was a mistake. Relying on the adventure and thrill of the tale more than the comedy has made this film mediocre at best. Let Puss be the comedic relief that he was originally written as. But since kids today are so ADD, action is necessary to keep their butts in the seats and continue making obscene amounts of money for the big corporations.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. This post brings out a lot of good points. I didn’t think Puss in Boots needed a spin off, although a character he is like a sidekick’s sidekick. In general though I dislike most spinoffs they just seem like a cheap ay to make more money off of a gullible fan base. However, this movie was made well and the characters have depth and the casts of stardom had the chance to break out of normal roles which I appreciate. All in all this was not a bad movie, but also if it never came out I wouldn’t feel like I missing part of the story.

  2. Pingback: Links to my comments on Awsome blogs again!! | History of Animation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s